MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045865533 · doi:10.1021/ic902567m

Ligand Metalation in the Reactivity of a Tetravalent Uranium Amides

2010· article· en· W2045865533 on OpenAlexafffund
Ilia Korobkov, Sandro Gambarotta

Bibliographic record

VenueInorganic Chemistry · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCoordination Chemistry and Organometallics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryDeprotonationMetalationLigand (biochemistry)Reactivity (psychology)Medicinal chemistryCarbon groupMetalStereochemistryDimerSolventCrystallographyOrganic chemistryIon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactions of organolithium reagents with the tetravalent UCl(2)[N(SiMe(3))(2)](2) and its DME solvate have been examined. Treatment of both compounds with methyl-lithium in diethyl ether resulted in one electron reduction of the metal center and gamma-deprotonation of one of the ligands. The dimeric {U[(mu-CH(2)-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))](2)[mu-Li(DME)]}(2) (1) was isolated from the reaction mixture regardless of the amount of MeLi employed. The employment of LiCH(2)SiMe(3) in DME led instead to multiple gamma-deprotonation events at the same carbon atom with formation of the trimetallic {U[(mu-CH(2)-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))][N(SiMe(3))(2)]}(2){U[(mu(3)-C-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))][N(SiMe(3))(2)]}{mu-OMe} (2) cluster centered on a fully deprotonated carbon atom. Crystallographic analysis revealed the presence of mu-OCH(3) units in the cluster as generated by DME solvent cleavage. A similar reaction carried out in the absence of DME led to the isolation of a closely related trimetallic {U[mu-(CH(2)-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))][N(SiMe(3))(2)]}(2){U[(mu(3)-C-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))][(mu-CH(2)-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))]} (3). One additional gamma-deprotonated fragment replacing the bridging methoxy group of 2 was present in this case. The presence of a fully deprotonated carbon atom bridging three metal centers and of one silicon atom was confirmed by both X-ray structures and NMR data. An attempt to reduce UCl(2)[N(SiMe(3))(2)](2) with KC(8) in a coordinating solvent resulted in ligand scrambling with the formation of two products. The first is a trimeric U(III) cluster formulated as {U-mu-Cl[N(SiMe(3))(2)][DME]}(2){U-mu-Cl[N(SiMe(3))(2)](2)}{mu(3)-Cl}(2) (4). The second was U[N(SiMe(3))(2)](3). A similar reduction reaction carried out in noncoordinating toluene resulted instead in an attack on the ligand affording the dimeric {U-mu-Cl[N(SiMe(3))(2)](2)[ horizontal lineN(SiMe(3))]}(2) (5). Alkylation of UCl(2)[N(SiMe(3))(2)](2) with n-butyl-lithium in hexane surprisingly yielded the pentavalent U[(mu-CH(2)-SiMe(2))N(SiMe(3))](2)[N(SiMe(3))(2)] (6). The acquisition of one additional ligand during the reaction hinted at the presence of other products in the reaction mixture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInorganic ChemistrySame topicCoordination Chemistry and OrganometallicsFrench-language works237,207