Exercise training induces respiratory substrate-specific decrease in Ca<sup>2+</sup>-induced permeability transition pore opening in heart mitochondria
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether regular exercise (treadmill running, 10 wk) alters the susceptibility of rat isolated heart mitochondria to Ca(2+)-induced permeability transition pore (PTP) opening and whether this could be associated with changes in the modulation of PTP opening by selected physiological effectors. Basal leak-driven and ADP-stimulated respiration in the presence of substrates for complex I, II, and IV were not affected by training. Fluorimetric studies revealed that in the control and exercise-trained groups, the amount of Ca(2+) required to trigger PTP opening was greater in the presence of complex II vs. I substrates (230 +/- 12 vs. 134 +/- 7 nmol Ca(2+)/mg protein, P < 0.01; pooled average of control and trained groups). In addition, with a substrate feeding the complex II, training increased by 45% (P < 0.01) the amount of Ca(2+) required to trigger PTP opening both in the presence and absence of the PTP inhibitor cyclosporin A. However, membrane potential, reactive oxygen species production, NAD(P)H ratio, and Ca(2+) uptake kinetics were not different in mitochondria from both groups. Together, these results suggest the existence of a substrate-specific regulation of the PTP in heart mitochondria and suggest that regular exercise results in a reduced sensitivity to Ca(2+)-induced PTP opening in presence of complex II substrates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".