MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045909303 · doi:10.1097/mlg.0b013e3180ed451b

Oncostatin‐M Enhances Osteoinduction in a Rabbit Critical Calvarial Defect Model

2007· article· en· W2045909303 on OpenAlexaff
John Moxham

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Laryngoscope · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
FundersAmerican Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological SocietyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsOncostatin MDemineralized bone matrixBone formationdBmInternal medicineMedicineX-ray microtomographyChemistryEndocrinologyInterleukin 6CytokineMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Oncostatin-M (OSM) is a member of the interleukin-6 family of cytokines with controversial roles in bone homeostasis. Evidence supports a role in bone regulation, but the balance between healing promotion and acceleration of bone destruction is unclear. It is also uncertain as to whether these varied responses may be dose dependent or related to interactions with other growth factors within the bone microenvironment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether OSM enhances osteoinduction in a rabbit critical calvarial defect model and whether there is a dose response curve. HYPOTHESIS: OSM enhances osteoinduction, and there is a dose response curve favoring lower doses over higher doses. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled animal study using arms of increasing concentrations of OSM in an inactive demineralized bone matrix (DBM) carrier to assess the degree of osteoinduction through standard histomorphometric analysis and a variant of the radiodensitometry technique. METHODS: Twenty-five skeletally mature New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into control and experimental arms. Incremental doses of OSM (30 microg, 100 microg, and 300 microg/g) in an inactivated guanidine-extracted DBM (Gu-DBM) carrier were implanted into a critically sized (13 mm) calvarial defect. Arms of carrier alone and no carrier served as controls. The animals were sacrificed at 4 weeks, and histomorphometry and radiodensitometry analyses were then performed. RESULTS: All OSM arms showed a statistically significant increase in bone formation and bone density compared with either control arm. There was also a statistically significant increase in bone area by histomorphometry between each OSM group, showing an inverse relationship to dose. Radiodensitometry analysis confirmed a significant bone density difference when comparing experimental groups with controls and also showed a significant difference between the low dose and the higher doses of OSM. It failed to show any significance between the higher two doses when compared with each other. CONCLUSIONS: OSM enhances osteoinduction in vivo and will close a critically sized calvarial defect in a rabbit model when delivered in a Gu-DBM carrier. There appears to be an inverse dose relationship with new bone formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe LaryngoscopeSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207