MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2045939820 · doi:10.1139/b02-013

Demographic structure of three species of<i>Sarcocapnos</i>(Fumariaceae) as a basis for their conservation

2002· article· en· W2045939820 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
María J. Salinas‐Bonillo, Víctor Suárez, Gabriel Blanca

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Botany · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologySeedlingSexual maturityLife expectancyMediterranean BasinEcologyMediterranean climatePopulationZoologyBotanyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The genus Sarcocapnos DC., endemic to the western Mediterranean basin, contains seven species, all of which are rare. Monthly monitoring of the number and flowering status of individuals as well as the appearance of new seedlings in five populations of three species, Sarcocapnos baetica (Boiss. & Reuter) Nyman, Sarcocapnos enneaphylla (L.) DC., and Sarcocapnos pulcherrima Morales & Romero-García, was conducted between July 1997 and June 1998. This monitoring was repeated in May 1999 and 2000. Given the difficulty in establishing the age of individuals, those that did not produce flowers in the study period were considered juveniles, and reproductive individuals that wilted for no apparent external cause were deemed senescent. Sarcocapnos enneaphylla has a short life-span, early sexual maturity, and high seedling production. This combination appears to be highly effective, because the species is widely distributed geographically with many populations. In contrast, S. pulcherrima and S. baetica have longer life-spans, delayed sexual maturity, and lower production of seedlings. The low recruitment rate in these two species is offset by a long life expectancy among reproductive individuals, although this strategy apparently limits their capacity for geographical expansion. The equilibrium growth rate (λ) varied markedly in S. enneaphylla populations (SE-1: λ = 0.570 for 1997–1998 to 1998–1999 and λ = 1.226 for 1998–1999 to 1999–2000; SE-2: λ = 0.832 for 1997–1998 to 1998–1999 and λ = 1.135 for 1998–1999 to 1999–2000) while in S. pulcherrima populations, λ was very close to 1 (SP-1: λ = 0.991 for 1997–1998 to 1998–1999 and λ = 0.969 for 1998–1999 to 1999–2000; SP-2: λ = 1.000 for 1997–1998 to 1998–1999 and λ = 1.101 for 1998–1999 to 1999–2000). In the S. baetica population, values varied between λ = 0.971 for 1997–1998 to 1998–1999 and λ = 1.345 for 1998–1999 to 1999–2000. In the three species, an elasticity analysis of matrix projection models revealed that the elements with the greatest effect on population growth were those of reproductive plants remaining within the same reproductive class. In addition, in S. enneaphylla, seedlings had important weight for population growth. The fact that the reproductive stages are the most critical to population growth should be taken into account where protective or conservation action is required.Key words: conservation, demography, endemism, Fumariaceae, Sarcocapnos, western Mediterranean basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.136 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of BotanySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207