Using lanthanide ions to align troponin complexes in solution: Order of lanthanide occupancy in cardiac troponin C
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The potential for using paramagnetic lanthanide ions to partially align troponin C in solution as a tool for the structure determination of bound troponin I peptides has been investigated. A prerequisite for these studies is an understanding of the order of lanthanide ion occupancy in the metal binding sites of the protein. Two-dimensional [(1)H, (15)N] HSQC NMR spectroscopy has been used to examine the binding order of Ce(3+), Tb(3+), and Yb(3+) to both apo- and holo-forms of human cardiac troponin C (cTnC) and of Ce(3+) to holo-chicken skeletal troponin C (sTnC). The disappearance of cross-peak resonances in the HSQC spectrum was used to determine the order of occupation of the binding sites in both cTnC and sTnC by each lanthanide. For the lanthanides tested, the binding order follows that of the net charge of the binding site residues from most to least negative; the N-domain calcium binding sites are the first to be filled followed by the C-domain sites. Given this binding order for lanthanide ions, it was demonstrated that it is possible to create a cTnC species with one lanthanide in the N-domain site and two Ca(2+) ions in the C-domain binding sites. By using the species cTnC.Yb(3+).2 Ca(2+) it was possible to confer partial alignment on a bound human cardiac troponin I (cTnI) peptide. Residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) were measured for the resonances in the bound (15)N-labeled cTnI(129-148) by using two-dimensional [(1)H, (15)N] inphase antiphase (IPAP) NMR spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".