MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046017517 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m111682200

Characterizing the DNA Contacts and Cooperative Binding of F Plasmid TraM to Its Cognate Sites at oriT

2002· article· en· W2046017517 on OpenAlexaff
Richard A. Fekete, Laura S. Frost

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverted repeatFootprintingDNABiologyDeoxyribonuclease IDirect repeatBinding siteDNA footprintingDNA binding sitePlasmidGeneticsMolecular biologyDNA-binding proteinGenePromoterTranscription factorGenomeGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

TraM is a DNA binding protein required for conjugative transfer of the self-transmissible IncF group of plasmids, including F, R1, and R100. F TraM binds to three sites in F oriT: two high affinity binding sites, sbmA and sbmB, which are direct repeats of nearly identical sequence involved in the autoregulation of the traM gene; and a lower affinity site, sbmC, an inverted repeat important for transfer, which is situated nearest to the nic site where transfer originates. TraM bound cooperatively to its binding sites at oriT; the presence of sbmA and sbmB increased the affinity for sbmC 10-fold. Bending of oriT DNA by TraM was minimal, suggesting that TraM, a tetramer, was able to loop the DNA when bound to sbmA and sbmB simultaneously. Hydroxyl radical footprinting of DNA of sbmA and sbmC revealed that TraM contacted the DNA within a region previously delineated by DNase I footprinting. TraM protected the CT bases within the sequence CTAG, which occurred at 12-base intervals on the top and bottom strand of sbmA, most consistently with other protected bases. The footprint on sbmC revealed that the predicted inverted repeats were protected by TraM with a pattern that began at the center of the repeats and radiated outward at 11-12 base intervals toward the 5'-ends of either strand. At high protein concentrations, this pattern extended beyond the footprint defined by DNase I, suggesting that the DNA was wrapped around the protein forming a nucleosome-like structure, which could aid in preparing the DNA for transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyFrench-language works237,207