MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046019676 · doi:10.1592/phco.2006.26.1.3

Antibiotic Selection and Resistance Issues with Fluoroquinolones and Doxycycline Against Bioterrorism Agents

2006· review· en· W2046019676 on OpenAlexaff
Jason E. Brouillard, Colleen M. Terriff, Andreea Tofan, Mark W. Garrison

Bibliographic record

VenuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Columbian Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoxycyclineFrancisella tularensisPlague (disease)MedicineAntibioticsAntibiotic resistanceTularemiaBacillus anthracisYersinia pestisBrucellosisAntimicrobialQ feverMicrobiologyIntensive care medicineBiologyVirologyVirulenceBacteria

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacillus anthracis (anthrax), Yersinia pestis (plague), Francisella tularensis (tularemia), Coxiella burnetti (Q fever), and Brucella sp (brucellosis) are all potential bioterrorism agents. Their known virulence, potential lethality, and ability to develop resistance to known antibiotic treatments make these pathogens particularly dangerous. We reviewed the scientific literature by searching MEDLINE databases and published abstracts from the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and the Infectious Diseases Society of America from 1989-2005 for studies of each of these biologic agents with the specific aim of examining whether doxycycline or a fluoroquinolone should be stockpiled for mass-scale postexposure prophylaxis. An evidence-based approach was used to determine whether doxycycline or fluoroquinolones were efficacious (both in vitro and in vivo) against these biologic agents and to examine these drugs' respective susceptibility patterns and differences in cost, based on available data. Little published data are available on these pathogens, and much of the data are from studies that used older strains obtained from patient or animal sources in outbreaks decades ago. Doxycycline appears to show comparable minimum inhibitory concentrations to those of the fluoroquinolone class in most clinical and in vitro studies, perhaps with the exception of inhalation plague. Studies also suggest that development of antibiotic resistance is less likely to occur with doxycycline. Doxycycline is several-fold less expensive than most fluoroquinolones and appears to have similar efficacy in most scenarios based on clinical case studies and established Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly known as the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) breakpoints for staphylococci. Therefore, doxycycline should be considered as a first-line antibiotic in the management of bioterrorism agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.035
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.035
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug TherapySame topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207