MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046024739 · doi:10.1139/y04-055

Anatomical organization of motoneurons and interneurons in the mudpuppy (<i>Necturus maculosus</i>) brachial spinal cord: the neural substrate for central pattern generation

2004· article· en· W2046024739 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ksenija Jovanović, Robert E. Burke

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicZebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnatomyNeuropilWhite matterSpinal cordBiologyEpendymaNeuroscienceSomaAxonNeuroanatomyCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The isolated brachial spinal cord of the mudpuppy is useful for studies of neural networks underlying forelimb locomotion, but information about its anatomy is scarce. We addressed this issue by combining retrograde labeling with fluorescent tracers and confocal microscopy. Remarkably, the central region of gray matter was aneural and contained only a tenuous meshwork of glial fibers and large extracellular spaces. Somata of motoneurons (MNs) and interneurons (INs), labeled retrogradely from ventral roots or axons in the ventro-lateral funiculus, respectively, were confined within a gray neuropil layer abutting the white matter borders, while their dendrites projected widely throughout the white matter. A considerable fraction of labeled INs was found contralaterally with axons crossing beneath a thick layer of ependyma surrounding the central canal. Dorsal roots (DRs) produced dense presynaptic arbors within a restricted dorsal region containing afferent terminations, within which dorsally directed MN and IN dendrites mingled with dense collections of synaptic boutons. Our data suggest that a major fraction of synaptic interactions takes place within the white matter. This study provides a detailed foundation for electrophysiological experiments aimed at elucidating the neural circuits involved in locomotor pattern generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.212

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologySame topicZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207