MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Candidemia as a cause of septic shock and multiple organ failure in nonimmunocompromised patients

2002· article· en· W2046044915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Susan Hadley, W.W. Lee, Robin Ruthazer, Stanley A. Nasraway

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdrenal Hormones and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBayer Corporation
KeywordsSeptic shockMedicineShock (circulatory)CohortInternal medicineIntensive care medicineProspective cohort studySepsis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To describe outcomes of septic shock and multiple organ failure arising from candidemia. DESIGN: Secondary cohort analysis of data from the placebo arm of the North American Septic Shock Trial (NORASEPT II), the largest prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled multiple center study of septic shock conducted to date, with predetermined end point analysis of outcomes. SETTING: Adult intensive care units in 105 hospitals in the United States and Canada. SUBJECTS: A cohort of ten purely candidemic patients in septic shock were compared with a cohort of 376 purely bacteremic patients in septic shock. Patients were not immunocompromised, because patients on corticosteroids, with neutropenia, or posttransplantation were excluded from enrollment in NORASEPT II. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic variables, baseline characteristics, 28-day mortality rates, and multiple organ failure were compared for the two cohorts. Candidemic patients were more likely to have a history of underlying renal failure at baseline and to require dialysis at onset of septic shock. Both causes of septic shock are associated with an extremely high severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II: candidemic septic shock, 32 +/- 10; bacteremic septic shock, 30 +/- 8; p =.44). More than 70% of patients with candidemia and septic shock were in multiple organ failure at days 3, 7, and 14; patients with candidemic septic shock sustained persistent multiple organ failure and showed delayed recovery from multiple organ failure compared with patients with bacteremic septic shock. Mortality rate at 28 days was 60% in candidemic septic shock and 46% in bacteremic septic shock (p =.38). CONCLUSIONS: Candidemia with septic shock is infrequent in nonimmunocompromised patients but has a very high mortality rate, a high likelihood of associated multiple organ failure, and possibly a delayed recovery from multiple organ failure. Patients with candidemic septic shock are more likely to have underlying renal failure at baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care MedicineSame topicAdrenal Hormones and DisordersFrench-language works237,207