MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Initial Orthostatic Hypotension Upon Rising From Squat Is Explained By Rapid Vasodilation In Leg Muscles

2009· article· en· W2046051982 on OpenAlexaff
Kristine Matusiak, Lisa McVicar, Catherine Vipond, Michael E. Tschakovsky

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSquatMedicineOrthostatic vital signsVasodilationBlood pressureCardiologyHeart rateHemodynamicsInternal medicineAnesthesiaPhysical therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Standing up is a frequent (3-10 %) trigger of loss of consciousness both in young and old subjects. This is due to an exaggerated transient BP (blood pressure) fall within 15 s upon standing, referred to as initial orthostatic hypotension (IOH). It is unclear what causes the marked increase in systemic vascular conductance that leads to IOH. Two possibilities have been proposed: 1) rapid vasodilation in the contracting leg muscles, and 2) systemic sympathetic withdrawal evoked by a sudden increase in right atrial pressure. PURPOSE: This study tested the hypothesis that IOH is due to rapid vasodilation in contracting leg muscles with the effort of standing. METHODS: 17 young healthy University undergraduates performed three different experimental conditions; standing up after a 10 s squat, a 1 min squat, or a 5 min squat. Beat by beat mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR) and stroke volume (finger photoplethysmography, Finometer) and right femoral artery blood flow (FABF; Doppler and Echo ultrasound) were recorded. RESULTS: data mean ±SE. Quiet standing represented baseline for all hemodynamic responses. Within 10 s of standing from squat, MAP (mmHg) fell to a nadir significantly below baseline in all conditions (baseline vs. standing from squat: 10 s squat 89.1 ±3.8 vs.72.0 ±3.9, 1 min squat 91.2 ±3.6 vs. 69.2 ±3.1, 5 min squat 91.1 ±3.1 vs. 62.8 ±4.4, all P<0.001). This occurred despite elevations in CO (L/min) (baseline vs. standing from squat: 10 s squat 4.2 ±0.3 vs. 6.7 ±0.5, 1 min squat 4.3 ±0.3 vs. 7.0 ±0.5, 5 min squat 4.1 ±0.3 vs. 7.6 ±0.5, all P<0.01) and was explained by large increases in total vascular conductance (TVC; (ml/min/100mmHg). The increase in TVC could be attributed primarily too increased 2-legged vascular conductance (LVC; ml/min/100mmHg) (TVC vs. LVC increase from standing baseline: 10 s squat 43.0 ±5.3 vs. 36.7 ±6.3, 1 min squat 47.8 ±4.5 vs. 44.6 ±6.8, 5 min squat 54.9 ±4.2 vs. 55.7 ±12.2) which co-insided with the MAP nadir. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid vasodilation in leg muscles with the effort of standing outstrips compensatory CO responses and is the cause of IOH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207