Sudden Intense Exercise Increases QT Heart Rate Slope and T Wave Complexity in Long QT Syndrome and Normal Subjects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sudden intense physical activity is a trigger for ventricular arrhythmias in long QT syndrome (LQTS), and beta-blockers (B) reduce the risk of ventricular arrhythmias in LQTS. We compared the effect of graded (gradual intensity) versus burst (sudden intensity) exercise on QT-rate adaptation and T wave complexity in LQTS + B (n = 21), LQTS - B (n = 5), and normal controls (n = 20). Graded exercise consisted of symptom-limited bicycle ergometry (30 W, increment 20 W/min). Burst exercise involved a fixed 200 W load for 1.0 minute. ECGs were digitally recorded every 10 seconds during exercise and a 10 minute recovery period. QT-rate adaptation was quantified using the slope of the QT cycle length relationship fit to a quadratic function. Principle component analysis (PCA) was used to quantify T wave complexity. The QT-rate slope was two-fold greater with burst exercise than graded exercise for LQTS + B (-82E +/- 40E vs -36E +/- 40E, P = 0.0016), LQTS - B (-85E +/- 60E vs -30E +/- 50E, P = 0.011) and controls (-100E +/- 60E vs -48E +/- 100E, P = 0.0011) (E = x10(-5)). For each exercise protocol, there was no difference in QT-rate slope between the three groups. In contrast, the QT-rate slope during the 10 minute recovery period was similar between the burst and graded protocol for LQTS + B (25E +/- 40E vs 30E +/- 50E), LQTS - B (81E +/- 80E vs 85E +/- 70E) and controls (90E +/- 80E vs 82E +/- 80E). The coefficient of variability of PCA (T wave complexity variability) during burst exercise was greater than that during graded exercise for LQTS + B (41 +/- 15 vs 30 +/- 10, P = 0.017), LQTS - B (47 +/- 25 vs 26 +/- 4, P = 0.016), and control (46 +/- 14 vs 33 +/- 19, P = 0.012). For each exercise protocol, no difference in T wave complexity variability was seen between the three groups. In conclusion, QT heart rate slope and T wave complexity variability are greater during sudden intense exercise than graded exercise in LQTS patients (on and off beta-blockers) and normal subjects, with similar findings among the three groups of patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".