Hyperthermia Masks the Neuroprotective Effects of Tissue Plaminogen Activator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previously, we have shown that hyperthermia significantly increased neuronal damage after ischemic injury in a focal embolic model of stroke in rats. In the present study, we examined the effects of hyperthermia on the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in this stroke model. METHODS: In part A, efficacy of tissue plaminogen activator (tPA) treatment was examined in normothermic and hyperthermic rats after embolization of preformed clots into middle cerebral artery (MCA). In part B, brain perfusion deficits were assessed in rats after MCA occlusion. In part C, blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability was examined in rats after MCA occlusion. In part D, we examined the influence of hyperthermia on fibrinolytic activity of tPA in vitro. RESULTS: Results showed that treatment with tPA significantly reduced infarct volume in normothermic and 38 degrees C hyperthermic rats. When compared with normothermic rats, perfusion deficits in hyperthermic rats were significantly increased at both 3 hours and 6 hours after ischemic injury. Compared with normothermic sham-operated rats, Evans blue dye extravasation was increased in the injured rats with 39 degrees C hyperthermia. In vitro study showed that hyperthermia increased the fibrinolytic activity of tPA. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that hyperthermia masks the neuroprotective effects of tPA treatment after ischemic injury and that this may be caused by increased BBB permeability, increased edema, and early progression of ischemic penumbral region to irreversibly damaged tissue as shown by progressively increasing perfusion deficits in hyperthermic rats.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".