MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046389114 · doi:10.1029/1999gl002389

Arctic oscillation and Arctic sea‐ice oscillation

2000· article· en· W2046389114 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jia Wang, Moto Ikeda

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Center for Atmospheric Research
KeywordsSea iceEmpirical orthogonal functionsArctic oscillationClimatologyArctic ice packArctic sea ice declineNorth Atlantic oscillationArcticGeologyMode (computer interface)The arcticSea ice concentrationOceanographyOscillation (cell signaling)Drift iceSea ice thickness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The variability of the sea‐ice cover in the Arctic and subpolar regions associated with the Arctic Oscillation (AO) was investigated using historical data from 1901 to 1997. Unrotating principal component analyses (or empirical orthogonal functions, EOFs) were applied to demeaned, normalized sea‐level pressure (SLP), surface air temperature (SAT), and sea‐ice area (SIA) for the periods 1901–97 and 1953–97. The leading SLP EOF mode is the AO. The leading SIA EOF mode is named the Arctic Sea‐Ice Oscillation (ASIO), which accounts for 41% of the total variance for the period of 1901‐1995. This dominant ASIO is AO‐related; its spatial and temporal patterns are consistent with the leading modes of SLP and SAT, and with the total arctic sea‐ice anomalies. The second SIA mode is North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)‐related because sea‐ice anomalies in the Labrador Sea region and the Greenland Sea region are out of phase. During the last three decades, the arctic sea ice has significantly decreased, which may be the decreasing phase of long term variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations155
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamicsFrench-language works237,207