Magnetic ordering and fluctuation in Kagome lattice anti-ferromagnets, Fe and Cr jarosites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jarosite family compounds, KFe 3 (OH) 6 (SO 4 ) 2 (abbreviated to Fe jarosite) and KCr 3 (OH) 6 (SO 4 ) 2 (Cr jarosite) are typical examples of Heisenberg anti-ferromagnets on the Kagome lattice and have been investigated by means of magnetization and NMR experiments. The susceptibility of Cr jarosite deviates from the CurieWeiss law due to the short-range spin correlation below about 150 K and shows the magnetic transition at 4.2 K, while Fe jarosite has the transition at 65 K. The measured susceptibility fits well with the calculated one on the high-temperature expansion for the Heisenberg anti-ferromagnet on the Kagome lattice. The values of the exchange interactions of Cr jarosite and Fe jarosite are derived to be J Cr = 4.9 K and J Fe = 23 K, respectively. The 1 H-NMR spectra of Fe jarosite suggest that the ordered spin structure is the q = 0 type 120° configuration with +1 chirality. The transition is considered to be caused by a weak single-ion type anisotropy. The spin-lattice relaxation rate, 1/T 1 , of Fe jarosite in the ordered phase decreases sharply with decreasing temperature and can be well explained by the two-magnon process of spin wave with the anisotropy. PACS No.: 75.25+z
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".