Inhibition of brain angiotensin III attenuates sympathetic hyperactivity and cardiac dysfunction in rats post-myocardial infarction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: In rats post-myocardial infarction (MI), activation of angiotensinergic pathways in the brain contributes to sympathetic hyperactivity and progressive left ventricle (LV) dysfunction. The present study examined whether angiotensin III (Ang III) is one of the main effector peptides of the brain renin-angiotensin system controlling these effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: After coronary artery ligation, Wistar rats were infused intracerebroventricularly for 4 weeks via minipumps with vehicle, the aminopeptidase A (APA) inhibitor RB150 (0.3 mg/day), which blocks the formation of brain Ang III, or losartan (0.25 mg/day). Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and renal sympathetic nerve activity in response to air stress and acute changes in BP were measured, and LV function was evaluated by echocardiography and Millar catheter. At 4 weeks post-MI, brain APA activity was increased, sympatho-excitatory and pressor responses to air stress enhanced, and arterial baroreflex function impaired. LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) was increased and ejection fraction (EF) and maximal first derivative of change in pressure over time (dP/dt(max)) were decreased. Central infusion of RB150 during 4 weeks post-MI normalized brain APA activity and responses to stress and baroreflex function, and improved LVEDP, EF, and dP/dt(max). Central infusion of losartan had similar effects but was somewhat less effective, and had no effect on brain APA activity. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that brain APA and Ang III appear to play a pivotal role in the sympathetic hyperactivity and LV dysfunction in rats post-MI. RB150 may be a potential candidate for central nervous system-targeted therapy post-MI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".