Kinetics of glycoluril template-directed Claisen condensations Effect of thionation of the glycoluril
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Apparent rate constants for the tert-butoxide promoted Claisen-like condensation of a series of N1-acetyl-N6-aroyl-2,5-dithio-3,4,7,8-tetramethylglycolurils (9a9f) to give N1-(3′-aroyl-3′-oxopropionyl)-2,5-dithio-3,4,7,8-tetramethylglycolurils (10a10f) were determined by UV spectroscopy. Overall rate accelerations of 3.5- to 18-fold were found relative to the corresponding reactions of the 2,5-dioxo compounds (7a7f). Analysis of the Hammett plot for 9 and comparison with that for 7 shows that the key CC bond-forming step, where the enolate of the acetyl group of the substrate attacks the aroyl carbonyl group, is accelerated by the thio substitution. For electron-withdrawing substituents in the aroyl group, the acceleration is sufficient to make this step nonrate limiting: the Hammett ρ value drops from approx. 1.5 for electron-donating groups to 0.27 for electron-withdrawing groups. Deuterium substitution in the acetyl group reduces the rate slightly, a result consistent with a slow but partially reversible first step in which substrate is deprotonated. A similar acceleration and isotope effect are found when diacetyl glycoluril (2) and diacetyl dithio glycoluril (5) are compared. The implications of these results are discussed.Key words: glycoluril, Claisen condensation, kinetics, mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".