Phonon confinement studies in nanocrystalline anatase‐TiO<sub>2</sub> thin films by micro Raman spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Raman studies were performed on titania thin films prepared by polyethylene glycol (PEG) assisted, low‐temperature, sol–gel method. The Raman spectra of the films show a systematic blue shift in the peak position and a broadening in the full width at half‐maximum (FWHM) when compared with those of the bulk anatase TiO 2 powder. Several reports have appeared indicating this kind of peak shift and broadening of FWHM, which were attributed to the confinement of phonons in the anatase nanocrystallites. In this paper, we report an analysis of quantum size effect in the Raman spectra of nanocrystalline TiO 2 thin films performed by utilizing the phonon dispersion relation of the anatase phase which has been obtained from a work based on density functional perturbation theory (DFPT). For comparison purposes the quantum size effect calculations have also been done utilizing the dispersion relations of the rutile phase. There is good agreement between the crystallite sizes evaluated from the equally weighted Raman line intensity of the dispersion relations obtained from the DFPT and those determined by X‐ray diffraction. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".