Degenerate PCR-Based Cloning Method for Eph Receptors and Analysis of Their Expression in the Developing Murine Central Nervous System and Vasculature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eph receptors and their membrane-associated ephrin ligands regulate cell-cell interactions during development. The biochemical and biologic functions of this receptor tyrosine kinase family are still being elucidated but include roles in nervous system segmentation, axon pathfinding, and angiogenesis. To isolate murine orthologs of three zebrafish Eph family members (zek1, zek2, and zek3), we have used a degenerate RT-PCR-based cloning method specific for members of the Eph family. Although this method was effective for isolation of Eph receptor cDNAs, including members of both the A and B subfamilies, our results suggested that zek1 may not have a murine ortholog. The isolated cDNAs were also used to generate RNA in situ hybridization probes to examine the expression patterns of murine EphA2, A3, A4, A7, B1, B2, and B4 in 9.5-dpc mouse embryos. In addition to the expected abundant expression of these Eph receptors in the developing CNS and the presence of EphB receptors in vascular tissues, several of the EphA receptors were expressed in discrete regions of the developing vasculature. These results suggest a role for both EphA and EphB receptors in vascular development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".