Making the “Unstageable” Stageable: English Rewritings of Chekhov's First Play
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay examines three adaptations for the English stage of Chekhov's “unstageable” first play. As well as reflecting something of the broader context of the translation and reception of foreign plays in the English theatre, these adaptations are very illuminating on fundamental aspects of English Chekhov tradition, in particular its largely veiled politics. Michael Frayn's Wild Honey, which highlights connexions with Chekhov's later plays and reinscribes cardinal elements of English Chekhov, exemplifies the strategy of domesticating the foreign. In sharp contrast, taking issue with a tradition that sentimentalizes and de-politicizes Chekhov, Trevor Griffiths's Piano reconceives Untitled Play as a political play that comments on contemporary Britain. Meanwhile, David Hare's Platonov, which purports to stick as closely as possible to the original text, ends up, like Wild Honey, reiterating the familiar hallmarks of English Chekhov. The choices made in all three adaptations attest to the fundamentally political nature of the translator's intervention as well as to the translator's contribution not merely to the transmission of culture but to its production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".