Parasite-induced oxidative stress in liver tissue of fathead minnows exposed to trematode cercariae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although results from field surveys have linked parasites to oxidative stress in their fish hosts, direct evidence involving experimentally infected hosts is lacking. We evaluated the effects of experimental infections with larval trematodes on induction of oxidative stress in fathead minnows, Pimephales promelas. Juvenile fish were exposed in the laboratory to the larvae (cercariae) of 2 species of trematode: Ornithodiplostomum sp. that develops in the liver, and O. ptychocheilus that develops in the brain. For Ornithodiplostomum sp., lipid peroxidation concentration in liver tissue increased 5 days after exposure and remained higher than controls until the end of the experiment at 28 days. For O. ptychocheilus, liver lipid peroxidation concentration was higher than controls at 5 days, but not thereafter. Sustained elevation in lipid peroxidation concentration for the liver trematode may be explained by direct tissue damage caused by developing larvae in the liver, or by an immune response. These experimental results support those from field studies, indicating that the lipid peroxidation assay may be an effective biomonitor for parasite-induced oxidative stress in fish, and that the nature of the oxidative stress response is species and/or tissue specific.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".