COMPOSITIONAL VARIATIONS IN PLATINUM-GROUP MINERALS AND GOLD IN LENSES OF MASSIVE PYRRHOTITE IN THE DZHUGDZHUR ANORTHOSITE, FAR-EASTERN RUSSIA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The accumulations of massive sulfides, mostly pyrrhotite, and the accompanying Pt–Pd and gold mineralization in the more eroded Lantar part of the Dzhugdzhur massif-type anorthosite, Aldan Shield, Russia, are characterized in detail for the first time. The metamorphic basement host-rocks of the anorthosite massif are crosscut by interlayers and injections of pyroxenite and plagioclase peridotite, which have a different extent of pyrrhotite dissemination. Upward, they give way to olivine-bearing gabbronorites interlayered with bodies of sulfide-bearing pyroxenite and gabbro. Above is a zone 350 m thick of pegmatitic gabbroic anorthosites which hosts the main bulk of the sulfide ores of Nyandoma and Batomga areas. These areas differ from one another by intensity of occurrence of the massive and disseminated pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite nests, and late pyrite-bearing assemblages. Platinum–palladium mineralization is represented by moncheite, sperrylite and kotulskite. Copper-, silver-, and Pt–Pd-bearing gold is found in the pyrite concentrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".