Characterization of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters for application in clinical mammography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Five high-sensitivity metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters in the TN-502 and 1002 series (Thomson Nielsen Electronics Ltd., 25B, Northside Road, Ottawa, ON K2H8S1, Canada) were evaluated for use in the mammography x-ray energy range (22-50 kVp) as a tool to assist in the documentation of patient specific average glandular dose. The dosimeters were interfaced with the Patient Dose Verification System, model No. TN-RD 15, which consisted of a dosimeter reader and up to four dual bias power supplies. Two different dual bias power supplies were evaluated in this study, model No. TN-RD 22 in high-sensitivity mode and a very-high sensitivity prototype. Each bias supply accommodates up to five dosimeters for 20 dosimeters per system. Sensitivity of detectors, defined as the mV/C kg(-1), was measured free in air with the bubble side of the dosimeter facing the x-ray field with a constant exposure. All dosimeter models' angular response showed a marked decrease in response when oriented between 120 degrees and 150 degrees and between at 190 degrees and 220 degrees relative to the incident beam. Sensitivity was evaluated for Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh target-filter combinations. The individual dosimeter model sensitiVity was 4.45 x 10(4) mV/C kg(-1) (11.47 mV R(-1)) for TN-502RDS(micro); 5.93 x 10(4) mV per C kg(-1) (15.31 mV R(-1)) for TN-1002RD; 6.06 x 10(4) mV/C kg(-1) (15.63 mV R(-1)) for TN-1002RDI; 9.49 x 10(4) mV per C kg(-1) (24.49 mV R(-1)) for TN-1002RDM (micro); and 11.20 x 10(4) mV/C kg(-1) (28.82 mV R(-1)) for TN-1002RDS (micro). The energy response is presented and is observed to vary with dosimeter model, generally increasing with tube potential through the mammography energy range. An intercomparison of the high-sensitivity mode of TN-RD-22 was made to the very-high sensitivity bias power supply using a Mo/Mo target-filter. The very-high sensitivity-bias power supply increased dosimeter response by 1.45 +/- 0.04 for dosimeter models TN-1002RD and TN-1002RDM. The responses of all dosimeter models were found to be linear for tube potentials of between 24 and 48 kVp. Dosimeters showed a reproducibility varying from 15.5% to 31.8%. depending on the model of dosimeter. Micro MOSFETS model Nos. TN-1002RDS and TN-1002RDM used in conjunction with their respective high-sensitivity and ultrahigh-sensitivity bias supplies provided the highest sensitivity response of the models evaluated. Either micro MOSFETS model No. TN-1002RDS or TN-1002RDM used in conjunction with the appropriate bias supply provide the best choice for clinical mammography applications. Under these conditions, MOSFET dosimeters can provide a viable option as a dosimeter in the mammography energy range (22-50 kVp). The clinical application of MOSFET dosimeters must take into account the energy dependence and reproducibility to ensure accurate measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".