Construction over organic soils in an urban environment: four case histories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Four case histories relating to construction over organic soils in an urban environment are reported. Three of the cases can be classified as failures; buildings were unwittingly constructed over organic soils and the subsequent performance of the buildings was unsatisfactory. The presence of peat was recognized in the fourth case, but the design was carried out to accommodate the resulting settlements. Case history 1 deals with a small industrial mall that was founded in fill and was partially located over a peat-filled pocket. The building experienced large differential settlements, and extensive repairs consisting of piled foundations in the affected area were required. Case histories 2 and 3 concern single-family houses that were founded in fill overlying organic soils. Differential settlement caused severe damage to the houses. Repairs were required and consisted of levelling the structures on the original foundations and reducing the loads to minimize future settlements. In addition, a unique method of foundation wall reinforcement was employed in case history 2. Case history 4 documents the performance of a municipal roadway and sanitary sewer constructed over a deposit of organic materials. This sewer was designed with a flexible pipe to float within the fill over the compressible material, with provision being made for future settlement. Settlements of the road surface have been monitored. The information presented should assist the design engineer in mitigating the effects of having compressible, organic subsoils beneath structures.Key words: organic soils, peat, case histories, settlement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".