Characteristics of primary and late latent syphilis cases which were initially non-reactive with the rapid plasma reagin as the screening test
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the study was to determine the characteristics of primary and late latent syphilis cases that were non-reactive on initial screening by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) but reactive by treponemal tests. RPR test results of all primary and late latent syphilis cases in the province of Alberta, Canada during 1980-2001 were compiled. The proportion of syphilis cases that were non-reactive by RPR testing was compared with reactive cases. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with non-reactive RPR results. Among primary syphilis cases, 224 (26%) were non-reactive on initial RPR and were compared with 639 reactive primary cases. Independent factors associated with a non-reactive result were male gender (odds ratio, [OR] = 1.99 [1.22-3.26]), Caucasian ethnicity (OR = 1.77 [1.20-2.61]) and diagnosis during the 1980-1986 syphilis outbreak period in Alberta (OR = 3.13 [1.45-6.74]). Of the late latent cases, 512 (39%) were non-reactive by RPR and 791 were reactive. A non-reactive test for late latent cases was associated with male gender (OR = 2.91 [2.15-3.94]), Canadian Aboriginal (OR = 2.91 [1.59-5.32]), Caucasian (OR = 1.87 [1.35-2.58]), black ethnicity (OR = 1.76 [1.28-2.42]) and diagnosis during the 1980-1986 Alberta syphilis outbreak (OR = 1.67 [1.29-2.16]). RPR testing alone is insufficient to diagnose primary and late latent infections under certain conditions and patient characteristics. Case detection was lower for late latent syphilis when compared with primary syphilis based on the properties of the RPR. Further studies are needed to inform the optimal use of the RPR test in laboratory testing algorithms for the diagnosis of syphilis and to determine the cost effectiveness of better screening tests for syphilis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".