Relaxations and nano-phase-separation in ultraviscous heptanol-alkyl halide mixture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To gain insight into the effects of liquid-liquid phase separation on molecular relaxation behavior we have studied an apparently homogeneous mixture of 5-methyl-2-hexanol and isoamylbromide by dielectric spectroscopy over a broad temperature range. It shows two relaxation regions, widely separated in frequency and temperature, with the low-frequency relaxation due to the alcohol and the high-frequency relaxation due to the halide. In the mixture, the equilibrium dielectric permittivity epsilon(s) of the alcohol is 41% of the pure state at 155.7 K and epsilon(s) of isoamylbromide is approximately 86% of the pure state at 128.7 K. The difference decreases for the alcohol component with decreasing temperature and increases for the isoamylbromide component. The relaxation time tau of 5-methyl-2-hexanol in the mixture at 155.7 K is over five orders of magnitude less than in the pure state, and this difference increases with decreasing temperature, but tau of isoamylbromide in the mixture is marginally higher than in the pure liquid. This shows that the mixture would have two T(g)'s corresponding to its tau of 10(3) s, with values of approximately 121 K for its 5-methyl-2-hexanol component and approximately 108 K for its isoamylbromide component. It is concluded that the mixture phase separates in submicron or nanometer-size aggregates of the alcohol in isoamylbromide, without affecting the latter's relaxation kinetics, while its own epsilon(s) and tau decrease markedly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".