MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046717371 · doi:10.1346/ccmn.2008.0560207

Spatial and temporal evolution of hydrothermal alteration at Lavras do sul, Brazil: Evidence from dioctahedral clay minerals

2008· article· en· W2046717371 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Everton M. Bongiolo, Patricia Patrier-Mas, André Sampaio Mexias, Daniel Beaufort, Milton Luiz Laquintinie Formoso

Bibliographic record

VenueClays and Clay Minerals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicClay minerals and soil interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIAMGOLDConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsIlliteQuartzGeologyChloriteSericiteMuscoviteGeochemistryScanning electron microscopeHydrothermal circulationMineralogyCrystalliteMineralization (soil science)CrystallographyClay mineralsChemistryMaterials sciencePaleontologyComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract TheAu-Cu (±Pb, Zn, Ag) prospects of Lavras do Sul, southernmost Brazil, arehosted in Neoproterozoic granitic and volcanogenic rocks. Mineralization occurs in structurally controlled N40°W to E-W quartz veins; sericite (±chlorite) and sulfides are the main secondary minerals in associated wall rocks. In the present contribution we use petrography (optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)), mineralogy (X-ray diffraction (XRD) with polytypes, FWHM, decomposition of diffraction patterns), and crystal chemistry of samples from several prospects to document the spatial and temporal evolution of sericitic alteration of veins and wall rocks associated with gold. Hexagonal, coarse-grained 2M1 phengite-rich alteration (± illite) is best developed with coarse-grained primary growth (comb) quartz + pyrite ± Au veins and altered wall rock from the western portion of the granitic complex (phyllic alteration). Pure phengite was recognized by narrow XRD profiles (FWHM ⩽ 0.2°2θ CuKα) of the <5 µm particle-size fraction, non-expandable d001 X-ray reflections and interlayer charge (IC) >0.9 per O10(OH)2. Towards the eastern zones of the granitic complex and in the volcanogenic rocks, wider XRD profiles (FWHM values ⩾ 0.2°2θ CuKα) were decomposed. They contain mixtures of coarse- to fine-grained, lath-like crystals of both 2M1 and 1M illite (non-expandable d001 X-ray reflections, IC between 0.85 and 0.89 per O10(OH)2) with expandable d001 reflections associated with lath-like, fine-grained crystals of ordered (R ⩾ 1) illite-rich I-S (80–90% of illite; IC of ∼0.8 per O10(OH)2), and minor amounts of regularly ordered (R = 1), illite-rich I-S mixed layers (75% of illite; IC of ∼0.74 per O10(OH)2). The dioctahedral clay association of illite + illite-rich I-S mixed layers (intermediate argillic alteration) is best developed in quartz + pyrite ± Au veins, breccias, and wall-rock alteration from the eastern portion of the granitic complex and in the volcanic area. Quartz from veins and breccias has fine-grained primary growth, recrystallization, and replacement textures, similar to those in epithermal deposits. The overall distribution of the dioctahedral clays indicates that the study area represents a fracture-controlled, tilted, porphyry to epithermal deposit, with telescoping alteration features observed in the east of the mining district. Deeper levels of exposure of a large hydrothermal system are observed in the west of the mining district, as shown by higher-rank dioctahedral minerals (phengite) that crystallize at relatively high temperatures (Tphe ≈ 300°C, phyllic alteration) associated with coarse-grained, primary-growth quartz veins, similar to those observed in porphyry deposits. On the other hand, shallower levels of exposure are observed in the east of the study area, associated with abundant, lower-rank dioctahedral clay minerals (illite + illite-rich I-S mixed layers, intermediate argillic alteration) that crystallize at relatively lower temperatures (TI-S ≈ 120–200°C). Available data show that gold is associated with phengite, but that lower-rank, overprinting alteration characterized by illite-I-S may have locally modified the original gold grades.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClays and Clay MineralsSame topicClay minerals and soil interactionsFrench-language works237,207