Spatial and temporal evolution of hydrothermal alteration at Lavras do sul, Brazil: Evidence from dioctahedral clay minerals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract TheAu-Cu (±Pb, Zn, Ag) prospects of Lavras do Sul, southernmost Brazil, arehosted in Neoproterozoic granitic and volcanogenic rocks. Mineralization occurs in structurally controlled N40°W to E-W quartz veins; sericite (±chlorite) and sulfides are the main secondary minerals in associated wall rocks. In the present contribution we use petrography (optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM)), mineralogy (X-ray diffraction (XRD) with polytypes, FWHM, decomposition of diffraction patterns), and crystal chemistry of samples from several prospects to document the spatial and temporal evolution of sericitic alteration of veins and wall rocks associated with gold. Hexagonal, coarse-grained 2 M 1 phengite-rich alteration (± illite) is best developed with coarse-grained primary growth (comb) quartz + pyrite ± Au veins and altered wall rock from the western portion of the granitic complex (phyllic alteration). Pure phengite was recognized by narrow XRD profiles (FWHM ⩽ 0.2°2θ CuKα) of the <5 µm particle-size fraction, non-expandable d 001 X-ray reflections and interlayer charge (IC) >0.9 per O 10 (OH) 2 . Towards the eastern zones of the granitic complex and in the volcanogenic rocks, wider XRD profiles (FWHM values ⩾ 0.2°2θ CuKα) were decomposed. They contain mixtures of coarse- to fine-grained, lath-like crystals of both 2 M 1 and 1 M illite (non-expandable d 001 X-ray reflections, IC between 0.85 and 0.89 per O 10 (OH) 2 ) with expandable d 001 reflections associated with lath-like, fine-grained crystals of ordered (R ⩾ 1) illite-rich I-S (80–90% of illite; IC of ∼0.8 per O 10 (OH) 2 ), and minor amounts of regularly ordered (R = 1), illite-rich I-S mixed layers (75% of illite; IC of ∼0.74 per O 10 (OH) 2 ). The dioctahedral clay association of illite + illite-rich I-S mixed layers (intermediate argillic alteration) is best developed in quartz + pyrite ± Au veins, breccias, and wall-rock alteration from the eastern portion of the granitic complex and in the volcanic area. Quartz from veins and breccias has fine-grained primary growth, recrystallization, and replacement textures, similar to those in epithermal deposits. The overall distribution of the dioctahedral clays indicates that the study area represents a fracture-controlled, tilted, porphyry to epithermal deposit, with telescoping alteration features observed in the east of the mining district. Deeper levels of exposure of a large hydrothermal system are observed in the west of the mining district, as shown by higher-rank dioctahedral minerals (phengite) that crystallize at relatively high temperatures ( T phe ≈ 300°C, phyllic alteration) associated with coarse-grained, primary-growth quartz veins, similar to those observed in porphyry deposits. On the other hand, shallower levels of exposure are observed in the east of the study area, associated with abundant, lower-rank dioctahedral clay minerals (illite + illite-rich I-S mixed layers, intermediate argillic alteration) that crystallize at relatively lower temperatures ( T I-S ≈ 120–200°C). Available data show that gold is associated with phengite, but that lower-rank, overprinting alteration characterized by illite-I-S may have locally modified the original gold grades.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it