MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

16th European White Dwarfs Workshop

2009· article· en· W2046743562 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. Garcı́a–Berro, M. Hernanz, J. Isern, Santiago Torres

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite dwarfWhite (mutation)AstronomyAstrophysicsPhysicsStarsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 16th European Workshop on White Dwarfs was held in Barcelona, Spain, from 30 June to 4 July 2008 at the premises of the UPC. Almost 120 participants from Europe (France, Germany, United Kingdom, Italy, and several others), America (USA, Canada, Argentina, Brazil, and Chile), and other continents (Australia, South Africa, . . . ) attended the workshop. Among these participants were the most relevant specialists in the field. The topics covered by the conference were: White dwarf structure and evolution Progenitors and Planetary Nebulae White dwarfs in binaries: cataclysmic variables, double degenerates and other binaries White dwarfs, dust disks and planetary systems Atmospheres, chemical composition, magnetic fields Variable white dwarfs White dwarfs in stellar clusters and the halo White Dwarfs as SNIa progenitors The programme included 54 talks, and 45 posters. The oral presentations were distributed into the following sessions: Luminosity function, mass function and populations White dwarf structure and evolution White dwarf ages White dwarf catalogs and surveys Central stars of planetary nebulae Supernovae progenitors White dwarfs in novae and CVs Physical processes in white dwarfs and magnetic white dwarfs Disks, dust and planets around white dwarfs Pulsating white dwarfs Additionally we had a special open session about Spitzer and white dwarfs. The Proceedings of the 16th European Workshop on White Dwarfs are representative of the current state-of-the-art of the research field and include new and exciting results. We acknowledge the very positive attitude of the attendants to the workshop, which stimulated very fruitful discussions that took place in all the sessions and after the official schedule. Also, the meeting allowed new collaborations tp start that will undoubtedly result in significant advances in the research field. We also acknowledge the willingness of the participants to deliver their contributions before the final deadline. We sincerely thank them. The white dwarf community has been steadily growing since the first white dwarf workshop, held in Kiel (Germany) in 1974. Some of the participants in the first colloquium have already effectively retired; others – although officially retired – continue to attend successive workshops, Professor Weidemann, one of the first organizers, being a leading example. We hope we will be able to continue counting on them for many years. A very graphical view of the evolution of the field can be found in the homepage of Professor Detlev Koester, who has collected pictures of almost all the previous workshops:. Additionally, several astronomers coming from related fields have joined our (not so) small community. Most importantly, several generations of young scientists gave their first talks in these workshops. In summary our community is an active one, and we have close, durable and solid ties of friendship. We are optimistic and we foresee that the spirit of the previous workshops will continue in future editions. We would like to express our deepest gratitude to our sponsors: The Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC), the Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (CSIC), the Institute for Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC), the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science, the Generalitat de Catalunya, the Ajuntament de Barcelona, the School of Civil Engineering of Barcelona and UPCnet. Finally, the IEEC staff and our graduate students have enthusiastically supported the organization of the workshop in every single detail; without them we would have not succeeded. We thank them especially. Also, we acknowledge the task of the Scientific Organizing Committee, which gave their full support in all the scientific tasks. Enrique Garcia-Berro, UPC Margarida Hernanz, ICE (CSIC) Jordi Isern, ICE (CSIC) Santiago Torres, UPC Editors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207