Outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of children with very high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Schechter T, Ishaqi KM, Rojas M, Irina Z, Doyle JJ, Gassas A. Outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of children with very high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission.Pediatr Transplantation 2010:14: 377–382. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Approximately 10% of children with ALL present at diagnosis with VHR for relapse if treated with chemotherapy alone. They may benefit from allogeneic HSCT in CR1. We have reviewed the outcome of this population in our institution. Forty-three patients (median age: 8.9 yr) with VHR ALL in CR1 underwent HSCT from October 1994 to April 2006. VHR features included Philadelphia chromosome (n = 17), induction failure (n = 9), hypodiploidy (n = 6), MLL gene rearrangement (n = 5), and others (n = 6). All patients received TBI (1200 cGy) with either CY and/or etoposide. Stem cell source was unrelated (n = 24) and related (n = 19). Incidence of grade III-IV acute GVHD and chronic extensive GVHD were 25% and 16%, respectively. Twelve patients relapsed (eight received related HSCT). Eleven patients died due to transplant-related mortality (eight received unrelated HSCT). For a median follow up of 39 months (range 11–110), the event free survival and OS were 0.49 (95% CI: 0.31–0.67) and 0.53 (CI: 0.44–0.71), respectively. Outcomes of children with VHR ALL receiving HSCT in CR1 remain unsatisfactory. Relapse, mainly after related HSCT, and TRM, mainly after unrelated HSCT, continue to be major problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".