Synthesis, characterization, and CN bond cleavage of tungsten(VI)arylimido-calix[4]arene complexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The tetradentate, partially flattened cone tungsten(VI) imido-calix[4]arene derivative [W(NC6H5)(t-BucalixH)]+Cl, (4), is formed in good yield from reaction of p-tert-butyl-calix[4]arene (t-BucalixH4), and W(NC6H5)Cl4. A reaction mechanism involving a putative, bidentate calixarene intermediate W(NC6H5)(t-BucalixH2)Cl2 (3), which partitions by reversible cleavage of the imido group to give the known tetradentate calixarene complex W(t-Bucalix)Cl2 (2), and elimination of HCl to form the thermodynamic imido product 4 is proposed. A series of iso structural [W(NAr)(t-BucalixH)]+Cl (Ar = C6H5 or o,m,p-C6H4CH3) imido derivatives (47), which adopt a partially flattened cone conformation in solution has been prepared by reaction of dichloride 2 with H2NAr (Ar = C6H5, o,m,p-C6H4CH3). Reaction of W(t-Bucalix)Cl2 with aliphatic amines affords a red product formulated as the nitrido complex, 9, which results from facile cleavage of the imido CN bond.Key words: calix[4]arene complex, imido complex, nitrido complex, CN bond cleavage, conformation, metallocalixarene.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".