Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author reports two cases of adenosquamous carcinoma of stomach. The first case is an 87-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital because of nausea and vomiting. Endoscopy revealed a large type 4 tumor in the stomach, and biopsy showed squamous cell carcinoma. Total gastrectomy, cholecystectomy, splenectomy and lymph node dissection were performed. Pathologically, the gastric tumor consisted of a mixture of adenocarcinoma (30% in area) and squamous cell carcinoma (70% in areas). The adenocarcinoma consisted of signet ring cell carcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and tubular adenocarcinoma. Carcinoma cells invaded into the serosa. The gall bladder, lymph nodes and peritoneum showed metastases of adenocarcinoma. The patient died of five months after operation. The second case is a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor producing carcinoma. A 77-year-old woman was admitted to our hospital because of epigastralgia. Marked leukocytosis was present without inflammation. Endoscopic examination revealed a large type 3 tumor, and biopsy showed squamous cell carcinoma. Gastrectomy and lymph node dissection was performed. Pathologically the gastric tumor was composed of a mixture of adenocarcinoma (10%) and squamous cell carcinoma (90%). The carcinoma invaded into subserosa. Lymphovascular permeation is present. The adenocarcinoma element consisted of signet ring cell carcinoma. Tumor cells were immunohistochemically positive for granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. The lymph nodes showed metastases of signet ring cell carcinoma. The patient showed systemic metastasis, and died eight months after the operation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".