The lethal and edema factors of anthrax toxin bind only to oligomeric forms of the protective antigen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The three proteins that comprise anthrax toxin, edema factor (EF), lethal factor (LF), and protective antigen (PA), assemble at the mammalian cell surface into toxic complexes. After binding to its receptor, PA is proteolytically activated, yielding a carboxyl-terminal 63-kDa fragment (PA(63)) that coordinates assembly of the complexes, promotes their endocytosis, and translocates EF and LF to the cytosol. PA(63) spontaneously oligomerizes to form symmetric ring-shaped heptamers that are capable of binding three molecules of EF and/or LF as competing ligands. To determine whether binding of these ligands depends on oligomerization of PA(63), we prepared two oligomerization-deficient forms of this protein, each mutated on a different PA(63)-PA(63) contact face. In solution or when bound to receptors on Chinese hamster ovary K1 cells, neither mutant alone bound ligand, but a mixture of them did. After the two mutants were proteolytically activated and mixed with ligand in solution, a ternary complex was isolated containing one molecule of each protein. Thus EF and LF bind stably only to PA(63) dimers or higher order oligomers. These findings are relevant to the kinetics and pathways of assembly of anthrax toxin complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".