MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2046995217 · doi:10.3133/ofr0066

Ground-water, surface-water, and water-chemistry data, Black Mesa area, northeastern Arizona: 1998

2000· article· en· W2046995217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Margot Truini, Bradley M. Baum, Gregory R. Littin, Gayl Shingoitewa-Honanie

Bibliographic record

VenueAntarctica A Keystone in a Changing World · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicGroundwater flow and contamination studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferGroundwaterHydrology (agriculture)Water tableGeologySurface waterSurficial aquiferWater levelArtesian aquiferWater wellAcrePiezometerGroundwater rechargeEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeographyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical concentration and water temperature are given only in metric units.Chemical concentration in water is given in milligrams per liter (mg/L) or micrograms per liter (µg/L).Milligrams per liter is a unit expressing the solute mass (milligrams) per unit of volume (liter) of water.One thousand micrograms per liter is equivalent to 1 milligram per liter.For concentrations less than 7,000 milligrams per liter, the numerical value is about the same as for concentrations in parts per million.Specific conductance is given in microsiemens per centimeter at 25 degrees Celsius (µS/cm at 25°C).Chemical concentrations in streambed sediment are given in micrograms per gram (µg/g) or micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg).Micrograms per gram is equal to parts per million (ppm).Micrograms per kilograms is equal to parts per billion (ppb). VERTICAL DATUMSea level: In this report, "sea level" refers to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 (NGVD of 1929)-a geodetic datum derived from a general adjustment of the first-order level nets of the United States and Canada, formerly called "Sea Level Datum of 1929".

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.208
Threshold uncertainty score0.413

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAntarctica A Keystone in a Changing WorldSame topicGroundwater flow and contamination studiesFrench-language works237,207