MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047001394 · doi:10.1002/jcb.1223

Keratinocyte differentiation inversely regulates the expression of involucrin and transforming growth factor β1

2001· article· en· W2047001394 on OpenAlexaff
Aziz Ghahary, Yvonne Marcoux, Feridoun Karimi‐Busheri, Edward E. Tredget

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Cancer FoundationUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvolucrinKeratinocyteKeratinocyte growth factorTransforming growth factorCell biologyWound healingGrowth factorCellular differentiationMolecular biologyAndrologyBiologyChemistryImmunologyCell cultureMedicineBiochemistryGeneticsReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extensive skin loss from a variety of conditions such as severe thermal injury is associated with significant functional morbidity and mortality. In recent years, the healing quality has been improved for patients who suffer burns due in part to the usage of skin replacement mainly prepared from multi-layered sheets of cultured keratinocytes. Although it is known that keratinocytes are a rich source of wound healing promoting factors such as transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), it is not clear whether differentiated keratinocytes in a multi-layer form release this multi-functional growth factor and has any functional influence on dermal fibroblasts. This study examined the hypothesis that keratinocytes in mono- and multi-layer forms express different levels of TGF-beta1. To address this hypothesis, keratinocytes were grown in serum free medium (KSFM) supplemented with bovine pituitary extract (50 microg/ml) and EGF (5 microg/ml). When cells reached confluency, conditioned medium was removed and replaced with 50% KSFM with no additives and 50% DMEM without serum and cells were allowed to form multi-layers and differentiate. The conditioned medium was then collected every 48 h up to 24 days and the level of TGF-beta1 and the efficacy of a keratinocyte released fibroblast mitogenic factor were evaluated by ELISA and (3)H-thymidine incorporation, respectively. Northern analysis was also employed to evaluate the expression of TGF-beta1, involucrin, TIMP-1, and 18 S ribosomal RNA in keratinocytes at different times of the onset of differentiation. The microscopic morphology of keratinocytes at different times of induction of cell differentiation showed detachments (nodules) of many regions of keratinocyte sheet from culture substratum within 1-2 weeks. The numbers and sizes of these nodules were increased as the process of keratinocyte differentiation proceed. The results of TGF-beta1 evaluation revealed that mono-layers of cultured keratinocytes which were round, attached, and proliferating in KSFM + BPE and EGF containing medium released a significantly higher level of TGF-beta1 (196 +/- 58 pg /ml) relative to those grown in multi-layer forms (28 +/- 7.8 pg/ml). A longitudinal experiment was then conducted and the results showed that cells on the onset of differentiation released even greater level of TGF-beta1 (388 +/- 53 pg/ml) relative to those grown in KSFM + BPE and EGF. This finding was consistent with the expression of TGF-beta1 mRNA evaluated in keratinocytes grown in test medium for various duration. In general, the level of TGF-beta1 protein and mRNA gradually reduced to its lowest level within 12 days of growing cells in our test medium. When aliquots of the collected keratinocyte conditioned medium were added to dermal fibroblasts, the level of (3)H-thymidine incorporation increased only in those cells receiving aliquots of conditioned medium containing high levels of TGF-beta1. When involucrin was used as a differentiation marker for keratinocytes at different time points, the highest level of involucrin mRNA expression was found at the later stage of cell differentiation. In conclusion, high involucrin expressing differentiated keratinocytes seem to be quiescent in releasing both TGF-beta1 and a fibroblast mitogenic factor.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207