A mesoscopic approach for predicting sheet metal formability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A mesoscopic approach for constructing a forming limit diagram (FLD) is developed. The approach is based on the concept of a unit cell. The unit cell is macroscopically infinitely small and thus represents a material point in the sheet, and is microscopically finitely large and thus contains a sufficiently large number of grains. The responses of the unit cell under biaxial tension are calculated using the finite element method. Each element of a mesh/unit cell represents an orientation and the constitutive response at an integration point is described by the single crystal plasticity theory. It is demonstrated that the limit strains are the natural outcomes of the mesoscopic approach, and the artificial initial imperfection necessitated by the macroscopic M–K approach is not relevant in the mesoscopic approach. The effects of strain-rate sensitivity, single slip hardening and latent hardening, texture evolution, crystal elasticity and spatial orientation distribution on necking are discussed. Numerical results based on the mesoscopic approach are compared with experimental data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it