Beyond “add women and stir”: Politics, feminist development, and dene games
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The recent addition of a Junior Girls’ category to the Dene Games component of the Arctic Winter Games raises important questions about the ways in which popular physical practices are developed. In this paper, I examine efforts aimed at the “development” of physical practices and attempts at gender equity in Dene games in the Northwest Territories (NWT) and at the Arctic Winter Games. In so doing, I highlight the links between these popular physical practices in the NWT, politics, Western feminisms, and cultural self‐determination, while also suggesting possible future directions for women's involvement in Dene games. Résumé L'addition récente d'une catégorie des filles juniors aux Jeux Dene des Jeux d'Hiver Arctique pose des questions importantes au sujet des façons desquelles les pratiques physiques populaires sont développées dans un contexte féminin. Dans cet article, j'examine les efforts visant le développement des pratiques et des tentatives d'éthiques physiques dans les Jeux Dene et les Jeux d'Hiver Arctique. Ceci fait, j ‘ accentue les liens entre ces pratiques physiques populaires dans les Territoires du Nord‐Ouest (TNO) la politique, le féminisme occidental, et l'autodétermination culturel, tout en suggérant de futures directions possible pour la participation des femmes aux Jeux Dene. Keywords: developmentfeminismgender equityphysical practicesDene gamesMots‐clés: Développementféminismecapitaux propres de genrepratiques physiquesjeux Dene
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".