Interaction of Anti-HIV Type 1 Antibody 2F5 with Phospholipid Bilayers and Its Relevance for the Mechanism of Virus Neutralization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb) 2F5 targets a linear epitope within the highly conserved membrane proximal external region (MPER) of the HIV-1 envelope protein gp41 integral subunit. Prospective vaccine developments warrant efforts currently underway to unveil the mechanistic and structural basis of its mode of action. One open question relates to the putative role that membrane phospholipids might play in the neutralization process. In this work, we establish experimental conditions that allow monitoring 2F5 insertion into lipid bilayers. Then, we compare the abilities of 2F5-based MAb, Fabs, and 2F5-specific antibodies recovered from immunized rabbits to directly penetrate into lipid bilayers and block the lytic activity of MPER-derived peptides. Antibody insertion induced membrane perturbation, which was blocked on interacting with the peptide epitope, thereby suggesting that such phenomenon was primarily mediated by the epitope-binding site. The long, hydrophobic complementarity-determining region (CDR)-H3 loop contributed little to this effect. In contrast, the CDR-H3 loop was required for blocking the lytic activity of MPER-based peptides and viral neutralization. Thus, our results suggest that core epitope binding plus association with lipid bilayers are not in conjunction sufficient to support viral neutralization by 2F5. Moreover, they support a role for the CDR-H3 loop in establishing secondary interactions with lipids and/or gp41 that would block the membrane-perturbing activity of MPER during fusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".