Indications of two genetically different subpopulations of Atlantic walruses (<i>Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus</i>) in west and northwest Greenland
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in walruses from northwestern Greenland (76°30'-78°30'N; i.e., in the area of the North Water polynya of northern Baffin Bay and Smith Sound) and west-central Greenland ( 67°-68°N) revealed two genetically distinct subpopulations. The studied sample consisted of tissues from 91 Atlantic walruses (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) from northwestern Greenland (1989-1990) and 33 Atlantic walruses from western Greenland (1988-1997). The analyses were based upon 12 nuclear microsatellite loci and restriction length polymorphisms observed in the ND1, ND2, and ND3/4 segments of mtDNA. Evolutionary factors creating the observed genetic differences were mainly drift and gene flow, even though a more pronounced mutational effect was observed at the mitochondrial level. Hence, there appears to be some male-mediated gene flow between the two subpopulations, whereas female-mediated gene flow apparently has been restricted for a considerable time. No temporal variation in population structure was detected in the sample from northwestern Greenland. Females collected in the summer season in this area were shown to be philopatric, meaning that closely related females stay and (or) travel together with a mean relatedness value close to the expected relatedness value for half siblings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".