MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047136746 · doi:10.1080/03632415.2015.1007205

A Comprehensive Approach for Habitat Restoration in the Columbia Basin

2015· article· en· W2047136746 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFisheries · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatStructural basinGeographyEcologyEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementGeologyBiologyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Columbia Basin once supported a diversity of native fishes and large runs of anadromous salmonids that sustained substantial fisheries and cultural values. Extensive land conversion, watershed disruptions, and subsequent fishery declines have led to one of the most ambitious restoration programs in the world. Progress has been made, but restoration is expensive (exceeding US$300M/year), and it remains unclear whether habitat actions, in particular, can be successful. A comprehensive approach is needed to guide cost-effective habitat restoration. Four elements that must be addressed simultaneously are (1) a scientific foundation from landscape ecology and the concept of resilience, (2) broad public support, (3) governance for collaboration and integration, and (4) a capacity for learning and adaptation. Realizing these in the Columbia Basin will require actions to rebalance restoration goals to include diversity, strengthen linkages between science and management, increase public engagement, work across traditional ecological and social boundaries, and learn from experience. La cuenca Columbia alguna vez albergó una gran diversidad de peces nativos y grandes corridas de salmones anádromos que sostuvieron importantes pesquerías y valores culturales. La conversión extensiva de la tierra, la interrupción de cuencas hidrológicas y la subsecuente disminución de las pesquerías han puesto en marcha uno de los programas más ambiciosos de restauración a nivel mundial. Se ha progresado, sin embargo la restauración ecológica es costosa (más de 300 millones de dólares al año) y aún no queda claro si, en lo particular, las acciones en pro del cuidado de los hábitats han sido exitosas. Se requiere un enfoque integral que sirva de guía para llevar a cabo una restauración de hábitats eficiente en términos de costos. Para ello es indispensable abordar de manera simultánea cuatro aspectos: 1) los fundamentos científicos de la ecología paisajística y el concepto de resiliencia; 2) apoyo público amplio; 3) gobernanza para la colaboración e integración; y 4) adaptabilidad y capacidad de aprendizaje. Lograr esto en la cuenca de Columbia demanda de acciones que tiendan a un balance en los objetivos de la restauración incluyendo la diversidad, el fortalecimiento de los lazos entre la ciencia y el manejo, un mayor compromiso social, trabajo a través de las fronteras de la ecología y la sociedad y el aprendizaje derivado de la experiencia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.181

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it