MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047147039 · doi:10.2478/v10134-010-0018-7

Pre-clinical transgenic mouse models of nervous system tumors

2010· article· en· W2047147039 on OpenAlexaff
Sameer Agnihotri, Diana M. Muñoz, Abhijit Guha

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Neuroscience · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenToronto Western HospitalUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGliomaMedicinePreclinical testingGlioblastomaTransgeneGenetically modified mouseRadiation therapyCancer researchCentral nervous systemBioinformaticsPathologyBiologyNeuroscienceGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The most common primary CNS tumors are gliomas, where other than a few subtypes such as oligodendrogliomas, the survival has remained unchanged despite advances in surgical, chemo- and radiation therapy, especially for the most malignant and common glioma; glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Recent novel therapies like immuno- and gene therapy have shown some promise in existing pre-clinical models, but have failed to demonstrate therapeutic benefit in patients. The reason(s) for such failures include our incomplete understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors and also due to testing of novel biological therapies in less than ideal pre-clinical models, which for the most part have included xenografts established in mice from glioma cell lines or patient explants. Transgenic mouse models offers an opportunity to develop and utilize an easily replenished, reproducible, manipulated spontaneous and more appropriate pre-clinical model of human cancers. Here we highlight on how mouse models are generated using several techniques and how mouse models have come to the forefront to address several issues such as identifying novel tumour modifier genes of central and peripheral nervous system tumours. Lastly we discuss how mouse models may provide an invaluable tool in pre clinical drug screening and testing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.359

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTranslational NeuroscienceSame topicGlioma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207