Fibrillin-1 Interactions with Fibulins Depend on the First Hybrid Domain and Provide an Adaptor Function to Tropoelastin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fibrillin-containing microfibrils in elastic and nonelastic extracellular matrices play important structural and functional roles in various tissues, including blood vessels, lung, skin, and bone. Microfibrils are supramolecular aggregates of several protein and nonprotein components. Recently, a large region in the N-terminal portion of fibrillin-1 was characterized as a multifunctional protein interaction site, including binding sites for fibulin-2 and -5 among others. Using a panel of recombinant fibrillin-1 swapped domain and deletion fragments, we demonstrate here that the conserved first hybrid domain in fibrillin-1 is essential for binding to fibulin-2, -4, and -5. Fibulin-3 and various isoforms of fibulin-1 did not interact with fibrillin-1. Although the first hybrid domain in fibrillin-1 is located in close vicinity to the self-assembly epitope, binding of fibulin-2, -4, and -5 did not interfere with self-assembly. However, these fibulins can associate with microfibrils at various levels of maturity. Formation of ternary complexes between fibrillin-1, fibulins, and tropoelastin demonstrated that fibulin-2 and -5 but much less fibulin-4, are able to act as molecular adaptors between fibrillin-1 and tropoelastin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".