MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Luminescence Imaging of Extended Defects in SiC via Hyperspectral Imaging

2012· article· en· W2047157326 on OpenAlexaff
Joshua D. Caldwell, Laurent Lombez, Amaury Delamarre, Jean‐François Guillemoles, Brice Bourgoin, Brett Hull, Marc Verhaegen

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials science forum · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies
Canadian institutionsPhoton Etc (Canada)
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchDefense Advanced Research Projects Agency
KeywordsMaterials scienceElectroluminescenceHyperspectral imagingOptoelectronicsLuminescenceDiodeSilicon carbidePIN diodeSchottky diodeImaging spectroscopyNanotechnologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the past decade, improvements in silicon carbide growth and materials has led to the development of commercialized unipolar devices such as Schottky diodes and MOSFETs, however, much work remains to realizing the goal of wide-scale commercialization of both unipolar and bipolar devices such as pin diodes or IGBTs, for high applications requiring high powers, operating in elevated temperatures or radiation environments or for many fast switching applications. Despite the great strides that have been made in reducing extended and point defect densities during this period, such defects still remain and with the push to lower off-cut angle substrates are in many cases seeing increases in prevalence. Thus, spectroscopic and imaging techniques for locating and identifying these defects are in high demand. Luminescence imaging and spectroscopy have both been utilized heavily in such work, yet simultaneously obtaining corresponding spectroscopic and spatial information from such defects is problematic. Here we report on hyperspectral imaging of electroluminescence from SiC pin diodes, whereby a stack of luminescence images are collected over a wide spectral range (400-900 nm), thereby providing the ability to both image distinct features and identify their corresponding spectral properties. This process is also equally applicable to collecting either photo- or electroluminescence from other materials or devices emitting in either the UV-Vis or NIR spectral range, as well as to reflectance, transmission or other imaging techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaterials science forumSame topicSilicon Carbide Semiconductor TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207