MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047162330 · doi:10.2118/117335-ms

Utilizing Natural Gas Huff and Puff to Enhance Production in Heavy Oil Reservoir

2008· article· en· W2047162330 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Thermal Operations and Heavy Oil Symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBubble pointPetroleum engineeringViscosityGas oil ratioNatural gasCabin pressurizationOil productionOil viscosityBubbleEnvironmental scienceEnhanced oil recoveryFossil fuelTight oilGeologyMaterials scienceMechanicsWaste managementEngineeringPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract L Block is a super-deep heavy oil reservoir with the degassed oil viscosity of 9,680∼12,000mPa.s @50☐, 2800∼3300 m deep with normal pressure system and 80∼95☐ in the reservoir. The GOR is 12m3/m3 and the initial bubble point pressure is only 4MPa. High oil viscosity and low flowability result in low production and rapid decline of primary development. This paper will review mechanisms, feasibility and pilot test of utilizing natural gas huff and puff to enhance production in L Block. Firstly, the paper will detail the lab experiments which include the conventional PVT and unconventional PVT. The conventional PVT shows that the natural gas dissolved in the oil can greatly decrease oil viscosity by 1∼2 orders of magnitude and enhance the flowability in one hand, in other hand, it can large the volume coefficient and add the elastic energy. The unconventional PVT shows that the heavy oil can effectively entrap the gas for more than several hours because of its high viscosity. There exists a pseudo bubble point pressure far lower than bubble point pressure in the manmade foamy oil, which is relative to the depressurization rate. Under the condition, the elastic energy could be maintained in a wider pressure scope than natural depletion without gas injection. Secondly, the paper will introduce a special experiment apparatus which can simulate the process of gas huff and puff in the reservoir. The huff and puff experiment shows that in this process the foamy oil can be seen and most of oil flows to the producer in pseudo single phase, which is one of the most important mechanisms of enhancing production. Finally, the paper will brief the pilot test of single well, which shows that the oil production is increased to 5∼6 m3/d from 1∼2m3/d by natural gas huff and puff and the stable production period is prolonged to 91days in the first cycle and 245 days in the second cycle from 5∼10 days before huff and puff.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it