MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047164593 · doi:10.1159/000213487

Increased Nuchal Translucency and Other Ultrasound Findings in a Case of Simpson-Golabi-Behmel Syndrome

2008· article· en· W2047164593 on OpenAlexaff
Chumei Li, Sarah D. McDonald

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal Diagnosis and Therapy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMacroglossiaPolyhydramniosNuchal Translucency MeasurementProbandPrenatal diagnosisFetal echocardiographyFetusCraniosynostosisObstetricsGestationNuchal translucencyPregnancyAnatomyPathologyTongueGeneticsMutation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Fetal imaging, in particular nuchal translucency, is playing an increasingly important role in diagnosing genetic syndromes. We report imaging findings of a male fetus with Simpson-Golabi-Behmel (SGB) syndrome. METHODS AND RESULTS: The SGB case was noted to have increased nuchal translucency on integrated prenatal screening, in conjunction with elevated maternal serum alpha fetal protein and body wall edema. Subsequent ultrasound findings at 30 weeks gestation included polyhydramnios, macrosomia, macroglossia, left-sided cleft lip and palate, nephromegaly, hepatosplenomegaly as well as an abnormal skull shape due to lamboid craniosynostosis. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first case report of increased nuchal translucency and craniosynostosis associated with SGB syndrome. A mutation in the glypican-3 gene was found in both the proband and the mother, who is a manifesting carrier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal Diagnosis and TherapySame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207