Dynamic vaccination games and variational inequalities on time-dependent sets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a model of a dynamic vaccination game in a population consisting of a collection of groups, each of which holds distinct perceptions of vaccinating versus non-vaccinating risks. Vaccination is regarded here as a game due to the fact that the payoff to each population group depends on the so-called perceived probability of getting infected given a certain level of the vaccine coverage in the population, a level that is generally obtained by the vaccinating decisions of other members of a population. The novelty of this model resides in the fact that it describes a repeated vaccination game (over a finite time horizon) of population groups whose sizes vary with time. In particular, the dynamic game is proven to have solutions using a parametric variational inequality approach often employed in optimization and network equilibrium problems. Moreover, the model does not make any assumptions upon the level of the vaccine coverage in the population, but rather computes this level as a final result. This model could then be used to compute possible vaccine coverage scenarios in a population, given information about its heterogeneity with respect to perceived vaccine risks. In support of the model, some theoretical results were advanced (presented in the appendix) to ensure that computation of optimal vaccination strategies can take place; this means, the theory states the existence, uniqueness and regularity (in our case piecewise continuity) of the solution curves representing the evolution of optimal vaccination strategies of each population group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it