MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

FIRE FREQUENCY AND THE SPATIAL AGE MOSAIC OF THE MIXED-WOOD BOREAL FOREST IN WESTERN CANADA

2000· article· en· W2047212340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEcological Applications · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of CalgaryPrince Albert Grand Council
FundersParks Canada
KeywordsTaigaBorealPhysical geographyDisturbance (geology)GeographyFragmentation (computing)Spatial distributionEcologySpatial ecologyMosaicCommon spatial patternEcosystemClimate changeHabitatBoreal ecosystemFire regimeEnvironmental scienceForestryGeologyRemote sensingBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One approach to ecosystem management is to emulate the effects of natural disturbance in producing landscape patterns; this approach requires a spatial analysis of the pattern and an understanding of the processes producing the pattern. Forested landscapes exhibit mosaic patterns of both stand types and ages. This study investigates the spatial mosaic of stand ages produced by high-intensity stand-replacing fires in the mixed-wood boreal forest of western Canada. A high-resolution, accurately dated, time-since-fire map for a large (3461 km2) contiguous area is used to produce the landscape survivorship distribution in which both spatial and temporal changes in fire cycle are statistically tested. Spatial multivariate analysis of the time-since-fire map is also used to investigate the spatial assembly of the age mosaic. Significant changes in fire cycle can be explained by climatic change as well as land use change in the surrounding area. The shift from a short (15 yr) fire cycle to a longer (75 yr) cycle after 1890 in the northern half of the study area coincides with climatic change at the end of the Little Ice Age. In the southern half of the study area, the short fire cycle continues after 1890 due to the spread of human-caused fires from the adjacent area which was settled and cleared for agriculture during the first half of the 20th century. Upon completion of settlement in 1945, the fire cycle becomes significantly longer due to the fragmentation of the once continuous forest that surrounded the study area and from which the majority of large fires propagated in the past. The different fire cycle histories of the two parts of the study area also explain the spatial mosaic pattern of stand ages, sizes, and shapes. The extended period of the short fire cycle through the first half of this century in the southern region results in it being dominated by younger, larger, oblong-shaped polygons with irregular edges: characteristics that describe the shapes of large burns. The northern region has generally older and smaller, more circular, compact polygons that are the remnants of larger much earlier burns that have since been overburned. The polygons in the northern region are more similar in size and shape but less similar in age to adjacent polygons than are those in the southern region. Thus, this study shows how spatial heterogeneity in the landscape mosaic pattern can be characterized and related to the disturbance history of an area. Furthermore, it provides evidence of the impacts on the age mosaic due to forest fragmentation in surrounding areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.409
Threshold uncertainty score0.459

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it