MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047304911

Una Revisión de la Transmisión Monetaria y el Pass-Through en Chile

2002· preprint· es· W2047304911 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Héctor Felipe Bravo, Carlos José García T.

Bibliographic record

VenueRePEc: Research Papers in Economics · 2002
Typepreprint
Languagees
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Theory and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonetary policyEconomicsInterest rateExchange rateDepreciation (economics)Monetary economicsInflation (cosmology)Quarter (Canadian coin)Inflation targetingShock (circulatory)Exchange-rate pass-throughGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First, this paper reviews the most important literature based on money VAR, which explains monetarytransmission mechanism and pass-through from depreciation to inflation in Chile and other countries. The focus is on (i) the length of the transmission lags from monetary policy to prices; (ii) the impact of monetary policy on output and real exchange rate; and (iii) the magnitude of pass-through coefficient. Second, we estimated four VAR models for the Chilean economy: three of them have short-run restrictions (SVAR) and the other one has long-run restrictions (VEC). Our estimations are different from other studies since we use an adjusted interest rate to consider the episodes of 1998, where the interbank interest rate was substantially higher than the monetary policy rate (MPR) announced by the Central Bank. This allows us to obtain a more precise identification of the monetary policy, thus the impact of this policy on prices and output was much lower than the effect found by other authors. Therefore, the monetary-transmission mechanism is characterized as follows; given a 100 basis points shock to interest rate during a quarter, inflation rate decreases by –0.2%, output by –0.4%, and there is a temporary appreciation of the real exchange rate by 0.4%. Additionally, monetary policy reaches its maximum effect between a year and a year and a half. On the other hand, pass-through coefficient turned out to be low and close to 18% after two years.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.626
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsSame topicEconomic Theory and PolicyFrench-language works237,207