MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047314738 · doi:10.1063/1.1636697

On-the-fly localization of electronic orbitals in Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics

2004· article· en· W2047314738 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Radu Iftimie, Jordan W. Thomas, Mark E. Tuckerman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of ChemistryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCamille and Henry Dreyfus FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLocalized molecular orbitalsAtomic orbitalMolecular dynamicsMolecular orbitalOn the flyDynamics (music)PhysicsChemical physicsMolecular physicsMolecular orbital theoryComputer scienceQuantum mechanicsMoleculeElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ab initio molecular-dynamics formalism of Car and Parrinello is extended to preserve the locality of the orbitals. The supplementary term in the Lagrangian does not affect the nuclear dynamics, but ensures "on the fly" localization of the electronic orbitals within a periodic supercell in the Gamma-point approximation. The relationship between the resulting equations of motion and the formation of a gauge-invariant Lagrangian combined with a gauge-fixing procedure is briefly discussed. The equations of motion can be used to generate a very stable and easy to implement numerical integration algorithm. It is demonstrated that this algorithm can be used to compute the trajectory of the maximally localized orbitals, known as Wannier orbitals, in ab initio molecular dynamics with only a modest increase in the overall computer time. In the present paper, the new method is implemented within the generalized gradient approximation to Kohn-Sham density-functional theory employing plane wave basis sets and atomic pseudopotentials. In the course of the presentation, we briefly discuss how the present approach can be combined with localized basis sets to design fast linear scaling ab initio molecular-dynamics methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.249
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207