MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Turnarounds: A Stage Theory Perspective

2002· article· en· W2047316057 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Shamsud D. Chowdhury

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l Administration · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Insolvency and Governance
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesCorporationManagementPolitical scienceOperations managementPhilosophyEngineeringEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In strategic management, an impressive body of literature on turnaround has accumulated over the last three decades; however, the topic remains largely idiosyncratic and open‐ended. Based mainly on the tenets of the life‐cycle family of process theory, this paper presents a composite four‐stage model that unfolds the dynamics of turnaround and provides a basis for the development of a theory on which to draw further. By categorizing the elements of turnaround as three critical requirements–incidents, events, and concepts–the model explains how the elements germane to each stage, when combined, facilitate the progression from a crippling deterioration in performance to an enduring success or to an eventual death. An analysis of the turnaround of Chrysler Corporation provides preliminary support for the model. The model's implications for theory, research, and practice are also given. Résumé Au cours des trois dernières décennies, un nombre impressionant d'études portant sur le redressement des entreprises ont été menées en gestion stratégique. Toutefois, ces études demeurent dans l'ensemble très subjectives et manquent un encadrement méthodique très rigoureux. La présente étude, en prenant pour base certains postulats de la théorie du processus de la famille du cycle de vie, propose un modèle à quatre étapes pour analyser le processus de redressement d'entreprise. Ce modèle pose les premiers jalons d'une théorie qui peut faire l'objet d'études ultérieures plus approfondies. En définissant les trois étapes constitutives d'un redressement, à savoir les incidents, les événements, et les concepts, notre modèle explique comment les éléments propres à chaque étape, une fois combinés, facilitent le passage d'une performance médiocre à un succès stable, ou à une mort éventuelle dè l'entreprise. L'étude du redressement de la compagnie Chrysler constitue l'illustration préliminaire du modèle. Enfin, nous discutons l'apport possible du modèle pour la théorie, la recherche et la mise en pratique des redressements d'entreprise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.112
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations99
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l AdministrationSame topicCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207