MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047355445 · doi:10.1021/ja808964e

A Solution NMR Approach to the Measurement of Amphiphile Immersion Depth and Orientation in Membrane Model Systems

2009· article· en· W2047355445 on OpenAlexaff
M. Sameer Al‐Abdul‐Wahid, Chris Neale, Régis Pomès, R. Scott Prosser

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicElectron Spin Resonance Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMicelleParamagnetismMembraneRelaxation (psychology)AmphiphileChemical physicsModel lipid bilayerCrystallographyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Lipid bilayerPhysical chemistryAqueous solutionOrganic chemistryPolymerLipid bilayer phase behaviorCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oxygen and Ni(II) are ideal paramagnetic species for NMR studies of immersion depth since they establish prominent concentration gradients across the membrane-water interface of either bilayers or micelles. Corresponding gradients of paramagnetic shifts and relaxation rates are observed by NMR for membrane embedded amphiphiles. Specifically, upon dissolution of oxygen at a partial pressure of 20 bar or more, (13)C NMR spectra of membrane embedded amphiphiles reveal chemical shift perturbations which depend sensitively on average immersion depth in the membrane. Similarly, depth-dependent enhancements of spin-lattice relaxation rates can be detected by (1)H NMR. Generally, such paramagnetic effects depend both on steric or accessibility factors and on the local concentration of the paramagnet. The steric terms can be factored out by combining paramagnetic rates arising from O(2) and Ni, in the form of a ratio, R(1P)(O(2))/R(1P)(Ni). The natural logarithm of this ratio is shown to depend linearly on immersion depth in a micelle. The analysis is verified using molecular dynamics simulations of dodecylphosphocholine in a detergent micelle, while thorough consideration of the paramagnetic rate data also allows for the determination of the orientation of imipramine in the micelle. Thus, a complete picture of topology arises from this approach which is readily applicable to studies of drugs and amphiphiles in fast-tumbling bicelles, small unilamellar vesicles, and micelles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicElectron Spin Resonance StudiesFrench-language works237,207