MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2047434593 · doi:10.5339/qfarf.2012.bmp23

Using CO2 laser for transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR)

2012· article· en· W2047434593 on OpenAlex
Mohamed Ali, Amr Zaher, Carmen M. Ali

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueQatar Foundation Annual Research Forum Volume 2012 Issue 1 · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Management and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyCardiologyInternal medicineEjection fractionAnginaHeart failureCoronary artery diseaseRevascularizationMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Coronary artery disease remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in developed countries and is projected to be the leading cause of death in the developing world by 2010. Affecting nearly 12 million people in the USA, it accounts for 50% of all cardiovascular deaths and is the leading cause of congestive heart failure as well as premature permanent disability in workers. About 1.1 million myocardial infarctions and >400,000 new cases of congestive heart failure each year, cardiovascular disease severely impacts men and women as well as various ethnic groups. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR) in patients with coronary artery disease, in whom percutaneous transluminal coronary angiography (PTCA) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) cannot be done. Method: Fifty patients were included in the study: 1) Canadian cardiovascular angina class (CCS) III or IV patients (only 5 patients with CCS class II were included and those patients were the early trial in year 1997 where the recommendations for TMLR was not yet established); 2) Ejection fraction of 30%; 3) Those with evidence of reversible ischemia (based on stress thallium perfusion scanning); 4) Candidates of neither CABG or PTCA (according to the results of coronary angiography). The laser system used was a heart laser system (PLC medical systems). Results: There was a significant improvement in the severity of angina as assessed by Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading after the procedure. Improvement was noticed after 1 month and the improvement was most significant after 3 months and then slightly declined after 6 months but still significant in comparison to the pre-procedural values (P <0.05). Also, there was a significant improvement in the grade of dyspnoea as assessed by the New York Heart Association functional dyspnoea class and the most significant improvement was after 3 months and the degree of improvement decreased but still significantly better than the pre-procedural values (P <0.05). Conclusion: TMLR offers consistent amelioration of severe angina in patients having no conventional therapeutic alternative. Surgeons should recognize that the procedure is intended only for the purpose of reducing angina symptoms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.384
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.412
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it